Legal Opinion
Dyhouse v. Baylor
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1983No. 82-147PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants noted this appeal from an order of the Superior Court granting a motion for summary judgment filed by Eastern Cab Company, Inc., one of two defendants in this case. The trial court did not make either “an express determination that there [was] no just reason for delay” or “an express direction for the entry of judgment” on appellants’ claim against Eastern Cab, pursuant to Super.Ct.Civ.R. 54(b). 1 Our ex- animation of the Superior Court file, of which we may take judicial notice, 2 reveals that the case against the other defendant, Warren Baylor, is still pending and that a hearing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Campbell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Vale Properties, Ltd. v. Canterbury Tales, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bazata v. National Insurance Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- General Motors Corporation, Etc. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McKethean v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Thorsten P. Sundberg v. TTR Realty, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cohen v. Owens & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Moradi v. Protas, Kay, Spivok & Protas, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.