(PS) Newson v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES NEWSON, No. 2:24-cv-0279 DJC SCR PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned by operation of Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff filed a request for leave to proceed 20 in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP, ECF No. 2, will be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.