Legal Opinion

Corliss v. Board of Bar Examiners

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 16, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Following our decision in Matter of Corliss, 424 Mass. 1005, 1006 (1997), the petitioner, Albert Henry Corliss, reapplied for admission on motion to the bar pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 3:01, § 6.1, as appearing in 393 Mass. 1235 (1985). The Board of Bar Examiners (board) had rejected two previous applications by Corliss because he was not a graduate of a law school approved by the American Bar Association, but a 1997 amendment to our rules removed that obstacle to admission. See S.J.C. Rule 3:01, § 6.1.4, as appearing in 425 Mass. 1301 (1997). The board recommended that this latest application be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Commissioner of the Department of Industrial AccidentsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. D'AMOUR v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. In re ColissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Wei Jia v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Britton v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. In re an Application for Admission to the Bar of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Britton v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. In re MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API