Corliss v. Board of Bar Examiners
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Following our decision in Matter of Corliss, 424 Mass. 1005, 1006 (1997), the petitioner, Albert Henry Corliss, reapplied for admission on motion to the bar pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 3:01, § 6.1, as appearing in 393 Mass. 1235 (1985). The Board of Bar Examiners (board) had rejected two previous applications by Corliss because he was not a graduate of a law school approved by the American Bar Association, but a 1997 amendment to our rules removed that obstacle to admission. See S.J.C. Rule 3:01, § 6.1.4, as appearing in 425 Mass. 1301 (1997). The board recommended that this latest application be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. Commissioner of the Department of Industrial AccidentsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- D'AMOUR v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- In re ColissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Wei Jia v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Britton v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- In re an Application for Admission to the Bar of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Britton v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- In re MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004