Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Moore

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 9, 2004Published

1DissentSosman, J.

I agree with the single justice — and with the hearing committee — that the falsehoods on this particular application for admission to the bar were so pervasive, and the respondent’s current dishonesty so apparent, as to make disbarment, not merely suspension, the appropriate sanction.

The court today imposes a lesser sanction, feeling compelled to do so by the fact that lesser sanctions have been imposed in other cases involving lack of candor on an application for admission to the bar. Ante at 292-293, 295. In those cases, the respondent’s false statements or omissions essentially sought to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In re FinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. In re PragerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. In re Application for Admission to the Bar of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. In re an Application for Admission to the Bar of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API