Legal Opinion
Parex Bank v. Russian Savings Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 2000No. 99 Civ. 8760(RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Parex Bank (“Parex”) has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to remand this action to New York State Supreme Court, New York County. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
Background and Prior Proceedings
On July 21, 1999, Parex, a Latvian bank which does business in New York, filed this action in New York Supreme Court against Russian Savings Bank a/k/a Savings Bank of the Russian Federation a/k/a Russian Federation Savings Bank a/k/a Commercial Savings Bank of the Russian Federation a/k/a Sberbank (“Sberbank”), a Russian bank which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gates v. Victor Fine FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- O'COnnell MacHinery Company, Inc. v. M v. "Americana" and Italia Di Navigazione, S.P.A. (D/b/a Italian Line), United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Hyatt Corp. v. StantonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, Indiana on October 31, 1994District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parex Bank v. Russian Savings BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In Re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria on November 11, 2000District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Filter v. Hanvit BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Lehman Bros. Commercial Corp. v. Minmetals International Non-Ferrous Metals Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001