Legal Opinion
Parex Bank v. Russian Savings Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 2000No. 99 Civ. 8760 (RWS)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Russian Savings Bank, a/k/a Savings Bank of the Russian Federation a/k/a Russian Federation Savings Bank a/k/a Commercial Savings Bank of the Russian Federation a/k/a Sberbank (“Sberbank”) moves, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and (6), Fed.R.Civ.P, to dismiss the complaint filed by Plaintiff Parex Bank (“Parex”) on the grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction, forum non conveniens, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated below, the motions are denied in part and granted in part.
The Parties
Plaintiff Parex Bank is…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of AzerbaijanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Tamam v. Fransabank SalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Indosuez International Finance B v. v. National Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hilaturas Miel, SL v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.