Legal Opinion

Beltran v. Myers

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1981No. 80-5303PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted a writ of certiorari, 449 U. S. 951 (1980), to review a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, holding that California’s “transfer-of-assets” *626statute applicable to “medically needy” recipients of Medicaid benefits does not conflict with governing federal law. Dawson v. Myers, 622 F. 2d 1304 (1980). Petitioner is an individual considered “medically needy” under California’s Medicaid plan,1 who represents the class of all such persons who have been denied Medicaid benefits because of previous transfers of assets for less than full consideration.2 She…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rossye Dawson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Beverlee A. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Herweg v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. American Management & Amusement, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. American Management & Amusement, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Marcus v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. In Re BennyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API