Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Antonio L. Forrest, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2005No. 03-5672, 03-5685PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

This is a federal criminal case that stems from the armed robbery of a convenience store by the defendant and two others. Found guilty by a jury, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year on a Hobbs Act charge and seven years — the statutorily mandated minimum- — -on a charge of brandishing a firearm in the commission of the robbery.

The Hobbs Act sentence reflected both a reduction in the defendant’s sentencing guidelines offense level for acceptance of responsibility and a downward departure from the guideline range. The departure was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Marlon Watford, A/K/A Tony Vallie and Ronnie RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Rodriguez v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. Braxton v. GansheimerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Jeffrey L. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. OssaiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API