New Directions Treatment Services v. City of Reading
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DIAMOND, District Judge.
The City of Reading, acting pursuant to a Pennsylvania zoning statute, has denied the request of a methadone treatment center to operate in a residential neighborhood within the City. The center and six of its patients ask me to declare this zoning decision unconstitutional and illegal, and “to issue a permanent injunction enjoining Reading to grant [the] zoning permit.” (Pl. Mot. for Sum. Jud. at 1.) The Third Circuit has cautioned, however, that “the federal courts should not sit as a ‘zoning board of appeals.’” Lindquist v. Buckingham Twp., 106…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cornell Companies, Inc. v. Borough of New MorganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007