State v. Maples
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendant’s motion for relief under Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp. 1969)] was denied without a hearing, and he appeals. We affirm.
As grounds for the motion, which defendant apparently prepared, it is alleged:
“1. Petitioner was sentenced without the aid or advice of counsel at any time during the court proceedings.
“2. Petitioner was not capable of intelligently waiving rights to counsel or representing himself. In that:
The above named petitioner had not progressed beyond the eight year of school. Petitioner was 20 year of age at this time and completely…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- National American Life Insurance Co. v. BaxterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Hardin v. State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. GuyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Mirabal v. Robert E. McKee, General Contractor, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. GreeneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. GreeneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.