Legal Opinion

Lee v. Severyns

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. 20792. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellant, as plaintiff, brought this action by serving and filing a simple complaint for money had and received in the amount of $13,500. The defendants answered with denials and an affirmative defense. The state intervened. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, resulting in a judgment denying any relief to the plaintiff or to the intervener, and both have appealed.

The case was submitted to the trial court upon certain stipulated facts as follows:

“Mr. Vanderveer: It is admitted by the defendants, I understand, that we have demanded the return of the money and they refused…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whiteaker v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Sauskelonis v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Smart v. CasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Moss v. Summit CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. ReissSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trevathan v. Mutual Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API