Rivera v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
We granted certification, 101 N.J. 223 (1985), to review the Appellate Division’s determination that plaintiffs’ suit for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -20 (No-Fault Act), was not barred by that Act’s statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). See Rivera v. Prudential Property and Casualty Ins. Co., 197 N.J.Super. 34 (1984). We reverse.
I
Plaintiffs, occupants of an automobile, were injured as the result of a two-vehicle collision of July 15, 1979.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Farrell v. Votator Division of Chemetron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Zaccardi v. BeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Aujero v. CirelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Mason v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Younger v. KrackeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Molnar v. HeddenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.