Legal Opinion

Rivera v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 24, 1986PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

We granted certification, 101 N.J. 223 (1985), to review the Appellate Division’s determination that plaintiffs’ suit for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -20 (No-Fault Act), was not barred by that Act’s statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). See Rivera v. Prudential Property and Casualty Ins. Co., 197 N.J.Super. 34 (1984). We reverse.

I

Plaintiffs, occupants of an automobile, were injured as the result of a two-vehicle collision of July 15, 1979.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Farrell v. Votator Division of Chemetron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Zaccardi v. BeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Aujero v. CirelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Mason v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Younger v. KrackeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Molnar v. HeddenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API