Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Texaco Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 3, 2001No. 00 CIV. 0439(BDP)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge.
In this ERISA action, Plaintiffs are former employees of Texaco, Inc. (“Texaco”) and Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc. (“TEPI”), who were hired directly by Texaco or TEPI and then reclassified as independent contractors in the early 1990’s. The plaintiffs bring this putative class action under various provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”). They allege that defendants Texaco, members of its Board of Directors, TEPI, and Janet L. Stoner, the benefit plans…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Novella v. Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- In re Aggrenox Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Schultz v. StonerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Black v. Long Term Disability InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.