Legal Opinion
Honeycutt v. Rickman (In Re Honeycutt)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided April 9, 1996No. Bankruptcy No. 94-10110 S. Adv. No. 94-1046PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the complaint filed by the debtors for wilful violation of the automatic stay, conversion and interference with a contractual relationship.
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a), 1334. Moreover, this Court concludes that these are “core proceedings” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) as exemplified by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G), (L).
In October 1993, the debtors purchased a recreational boat dock and rights to camping grounds from Jerry and Lois…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Downey v. United Weatherproofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Mason v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Martino v. First National Bank of Harvey (In Re Garofalo's Finer Foods, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Franchise Tax Board v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re HoskinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2001