Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Stone

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1924No. 6 Div. 36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a statutory bill to quiet title. Code 1907, § 5443 et seq. The bill avers that' “complainant is the owner and in possession” of the lands described. The demurrer goes to the point that the bill does not show “such possession” as will warrant relief, and does not aver “proper possession” in complainant.

The sole question here presented is: Must ■the bill aver the complainant has. “peaceable possession” or merely “possession” of the lands, in order to be good against demurrer?

Section 5443 of the Code of 1907 sets forth 'the conditions, or concurrent facts, upon which the right to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shannon v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Randle v. DaughdrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Parker v. Boutwell & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Lyon v. ArndtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Davis v. DanielsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watson v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Brookside-Pratt Mining Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Stoudenmire v. MimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API