Brookside-Pratt Mining Co. v. Wright
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
Statutory bill to quiet title. In their behalf complainants invoke sections 9905 et seq. of the Code.
The bill nowhere avers that the complainants are in the peaceable possession of the lands, nor does it employ any words of like import.
To present a proper bilí under the statute for the determination of claims to land, and to quiet title thereto, it is necessary to aver, inter alia, and the proof to show, that at the time of the institution of the suit the complainants’ possession of the land involved was peaceable, as contradistinguished from disputed or contested possession,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Randle v. DaughdrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Lyon v. ArndtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Davis v. DanielsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Watson v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Burgin v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davidson v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Mettee v. BollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957