Village of Newark v. Pepco Contractors, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and judgment granted to appellant, in accordance with the following memorandum: Summary judgment should have been granted declaring that United *662States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF&G) is not required to defend and/or indemnify respondents in the action against them by the Village of Newark. The Village of Newark commenced an action seeking $175,000 in damages as a result of defective construction of a street and named as defendants, inter alia, Pepeo, the contractor, and Perkins, Pepco’s principal shareholder. USF&G refused to provide a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lionel Freedman, Inc. v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Zandri Construction Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of NewarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Green Bus Lines, Inc. v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- George A. Fuller Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Terk Technologies Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Black & Veatch Corporation v. Aspen InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- McGinniss v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.