Legal Opinion

Garrison v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 24, 1980No. CA CR 80-34PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the state has lived up to its obligation to afford the appellant a speedy trial. We conclude that because the appellant was not tried within three terms of court as provided in A. R. Crim. P. 28.1(b), and because the delay was not attributable to the appellant or otherwise excusable, the state has not met its obligation, and the conviction must be reversed and the case dismissed. As our decision on this point disposes of the appeal, we will not address the appellant’s other point having to do with exclusion of witnesses from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foxworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Randall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Gregory v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Gooden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Eubanks v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Archer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API