Legal Opinion
DE ARCHULETA v. VORO INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 18, 2024No. 2:24-cv-05943Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANA DE ARCHULETA, e¢ al., Plaintiffs, No. 24cv5943 (EP) (MAH) ° MEMORANDUM ORDER VORO INC., et al., Defendants. PADIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Ana De Archuleta and Timothy Reynolds allege, in substance, that Defendants Voro Inc. and Voro Motors Inc. knowingly manufactured and/or sold a defective scooter that injured De Archuleta and caused Reynolds to suffer a loss of consortium and/or companionship. See D.E 1 (‘Complaint” or “Compl.”). Plaintiffs move for default. D.E. 8. For the reasons below, the Court will DENY the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harad, Charles A. And the Home Insurance Company v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Catania, Francis JCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Lee v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees—Burlington Northern System FederationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- DeTore v. Local 245 of Jersey City Public Employees UnionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Davis v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMSDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2007