Legal Opinion
Doe v. Uber Technologies
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 9, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00370Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JANE DOE, * . * Plaintiff, Vv. * CIVIL NO. JKB-20-0370 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC, * Defendant. * * * x * □ * x * * * MEMORANDUM In this case, Plaintiff Jane Doe brings claims against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) for the alleged tortious conduct of former Defendants John Kenney, Jr. and Charles Veney.! Now pending before the Court is Uber’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (ECF No, 27.) The motion is fully briefed, and no hearing is required, See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2018). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Kirthi Venkatraman v. Rei Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.