Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Toro Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1983No. CX-82-981Published

1Opinion of the Court

331 N.W.2d 243 (1983)

Carol JOHNSON, Respondent,

v.

TORO CO. (self-insured), Relator,

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, intervenor, Respondent.

No. CX-82-981.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 25, 1983.

Morse, Clinton & O'Gorman, Cottage Grove, for relator.

Gross, Von Holtum, Sieben & Schmidt and David A. Stofferahn, Minneapolis, for Johnson.

Indru Advani, St. Paul, for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

WAHL, Justice.

Toro Company seeks review of a decision of a divided Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals holding, contrary…

Also in this document: Dissent · Peterson; Dissent · Peterson.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Merrill v. J. C. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Ethen v. Franklin Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Ramaker v. Marjae, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Pasko v. BEECHER COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API