Legal Opinion

Ethen v. Franklin Manufacturing Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1970No. 41883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Relator, Albert Michael Ethen, seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying him benefits. The only issue is whether an injury arising out of a company picnic was work-related and, therefore, compensable. We hold that it was not.

The employee, a forklift operator, was requested by his foreman to take part in a tug of war at a company-sponsored picnic held on Sportsmen’s Island in the Mississippi River near St. Cloud on August 26, 1967. About half of the 1,100 employees attended. For some undisclosed reason the event in which the employee was to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Le Bar v. Ewald Bros. DairySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Youngberg v. Donlin Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Sandmeyer v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chilton v. Bowman Gray School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Bonfig v. Megarry Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. McDonald v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Ramaker v. Marjae, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Johnson v. Toro Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API