Legal Opinion

Traders & General Insurance v. Lincecum

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1937No. 6918PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Martin

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Judgment for compensation in a lump sum was entered in the trial court for defendant in error. This judgment was affirmed. Traders & General Insurance Co. v. Lincecum, 81 S. W. (2d) 549.

All questions raised and not discussed herein either pass out of the case by the disposition we make of same, or are such as will in all probability not again occur.

We sustain plaintiff in error’s ninth assignment of error reading as follows:

“Where the case is submitted to the jury on special issues, and one of those issues calls for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Bradshaw v. AbramsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GilletteTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Republic Insurance v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Republic Ins. Co. v. HaleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. McCaslinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Trousdale v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance v. McCaslinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Roy Jones Lumber Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1942

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API