Travelers Insurance v. Rushing
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant contends first that plaintiff’s action is barred by the three-year statute of limitations. We disagree with this contention.
Defendant argues that plaintiff’s cause of action to recover the $980 overpayment accrued on the date that compensation was paid under the original award of 30 October 1972, and that this action, which was instituted on 22 June 1976, is barred by the three-year statute of limitations applicable to implied contracts. We reject this argument. Until the original award was modified on 18 February 1975, plaintiff had no cause of action to recover the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Robinson v. United States Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Hartsell v. PICKETT COTTON MILLS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rothmans Tobacco Company, Ltd. And Rothmans (New Zealand) Ltd. v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Collins v. Biltmore Oil CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
- Maness v. Kelway Rentals SalesNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1997
- Rothmans Tobacco Company, Ltd. And Rothmans (New Zealand) Ltd. v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.