Legal Opinion
Samuels v. Smith
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 21, 1993No. Civ. 3:93-149 (JAC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Chief Judge:
The plaintiff, Kay Samuels, is a resident of 424 Garden Street, Apartment 1A, in Hartford, Connecticut. Defendants Paul Samuels, Eric Smith, Kevin Mellon, James Howard, III, Franco Sanzo, Craig Fournier, and Mark Samsel are members of the Connecticut Statewide Narcotics Task Force (“state defendants” and “Task Force,” respectively); defendants D. Roberts, Gamble, Morin, and Martin are members of the Vice and Narcotics Division of the Hartford Police Department (“city defendants”).
The plaintiff brings this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dawkins v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Dawkins v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Signorile by and Through Signorile v. City of NYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Foreman v. PA BECKWITHDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Stacey Wezenter v. Justin Marshall et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026