Badger Lumber Co. v. Marion Water Supply, Electric Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts are sufficiently stated in Lumber Co v. Water Co., supra, and in the opinion herein, filed at the session of the court in June, 1892.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
On the first consideration of this case; it was decided that the poles and wires attached to an electric light plant and premises were appurtenances of the same, within the meaning of the mechanics’ lien statute, and that persons who furnished labor or material for such appurtenances were entitled to a lien on the whole. Our attention is now called to another question, which was not.considered, but which is fairly in the record, viz.: Is the property of an •electric light company, having a franchise from the city to *188occupy its streets in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guest v. Merion Water Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1891
- Wilson v. School District No. 2Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Board of Education v. Greenebaum & SonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Hill v. La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Graham v. Mt. Sterling Coalroad Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hutchinson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Pittsburg Equitable Meter Co. v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Park City Meat Co. v. Comstock Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909