Legal Opinion

Bradley v. O'Hare

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.

In a suit between two labor unions which seeks an accounting of union funds allegedly misappropriated, the order appealed from strikes the answer of the defendant Joseph O’Hare, individually and as an officer of the defendant union, unless he (1) submits to further examination before trial; (2) specifically answers “ Yes ” or “ No ” to three questions he was orally directed to answer by a Justice presiding in Special Term; and (3) produces books and records, as provided by section 296 of the Civil Practice Act, as directed in an order for his examination before trial, dated November 23, 1955.

T…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. Carey Resources, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. In re Carol E. B., New York County Courts1975
  5. Kirtley v. Joseph Abrams & Richland Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API