Legal Opinion

Western Mercantile Agency, Inc. v. Froats

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 16, 1975No. 33647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

The plaintiff as assignee of McAuley Hospital brought this action against the Froats and the Public Welfare Division administrator for the reasonable value of 51 days of services rendered the Froats’ minor son. The Froats were welfare recipients. They cross-claimed against the administrator for all but 21 days of the hospital services, which the Welfare Division had already paid. Their son had been severely burned, which reasonably necessitated hospitalization which totaled 51 days. Welfare Division’s pertinent Rule Seven provides that the maximum hospitalization for which it will pay for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Public Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Beasley v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API