Legal Opinion

United States v. Harvey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1978No. 10843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The government appeals the trial court’s dismissal, for reason of prosecutorial misconduct, of the indictment in this case. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under D.C. Code 1973, § 23-104(c) unless the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment erects a constitutional barrier. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Scott, -U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978), we hold that we have jurisdiction; reverse the trial court; and remand this case with instructions to reinstate the indictment.

The events leading to the dismissal of the indictment for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Clayborne Jamison, Jr., United States of America v. Clayborne Jamison, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Jamison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Gant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API