Legal Opinion

Harris v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1992No. 87-155Published

1Opinion of the Court

602 A.2d 154 (1992)

Thomas E. HARRIS, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 87-155.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued en banc November 8, 1990.

Decided January 15, 1992.

Paul H. Zukerberg, Washington, D.C., appointed by the court, for appellant.

Elizabeth Trosman, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., Michael W. Farrell and Mary Ellen Abrecht, Asst. U.S. Attys. at the time the brief was filed, and John R. Fisher, David Schertler and Gregory E. Jackson, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, FERREN, TERRY,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API