Legal Opinion
Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 21, 2020No. 3:19-cv-05857Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FIYYAZ PIRANI, Case No. 19-cv-05857-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND 10 SLACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 52 12 13 Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint 14 (“ACAC”) filed by lead plaintiff Fiyyaz Pirani. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and General 15 Order 72, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Having 16…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.