Legal Opinion
Espinosa v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 15, 1990No. 2:90-cv-71467PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOPF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff filed a claim under the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (MHCRA), M.C.L. §§ 37.1101-1607 (1979), 1 for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of his termination of employment. Plaintiff alleges that defendant wrongfully discharged him because of his epileptic condition. Plaintiff seeks monetary relief.
This matter now comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff filed a timely response. Both parties have fully briefed the motion; and pursuant to E.D.Mich.Local R. 17(i), the Court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Betty Taggart v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Burns v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. (In re Rainbow Security Inc.)District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1994
- AUTO-ION LITIGATION GROUP v. AUTO-ION CHEMICALSDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
- Pennsylvania Ass'n of Home Health Agencies v. SniderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Auto-Ion Litigation Group v. Auto-Ion ChemicalsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994