Legal Opinion

AUTO-ION LITIGATION GROUP v. AUTO-ION CHEMICALS

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 15, 1994No. 4:92-CV-133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION RE THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

HILLMAN, Senior District Judge.

This civil action involves claims made pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. Presently before the court is third party defendants’, State of Michigan and Michigan Department of Natural Resources (the State), motion to dismiss the complaint filed by third party plaintiff/defendant, the City of Kalamazoo (the City). The State asserts that the City’s motion should be dismissed, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3), for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Auto-Ion Litigation Group v. Auto-Ion ChemicalsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994