Legal Opinion

Darling v. Cornstalk Products Co.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided December 31, 1931No. 252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

On May 27, 1930, receivers were appointed upon a creditors’ bill filed against the Cornstalk Products Company in Danville, 111. The estate included a plant, machinery, and inventory costing originally more than $1,000,000. Prior to the appointment, the comparatively small amount of pulp involved in the matter now before the court had been stored in Chicago, with the intervening petitioner, a qualified warehouseman under the laws of Illinois, sections 259 and 260, chap. 114, Illinois Smith-Hurd Rev. Statutes 1931, and at the time of the appointment storage charges in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Cowdrey v. Galveston, Houston, & Henderson RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Chicago Deposit Vault Co. v. McNultaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Northern Finance Corporation v. ByrnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brackett v. SedlacekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. O'Leary v. CurtisDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1941
  3. In re Avorn Dress Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Investors Security Leasing Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API