Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Fimmano

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 21, 1980No. 35,152; CM 433848Published

1ConcurrenceCook, Judge

Today, the majority wipes out two centuries of military practice and nearly three decades of decision in this Court to hold that an authorization to search must be based on information provided under an oath or affirmation. I cannot participate in that expungement. I cannot do so because, in my opinion, substantial differences between the military and civilian communities sanction a different application of the dictates of the Fourth Amendment.

Only six months ago, the Court unanimously reaffirmed the authority of a commander to authorize a search, notwithstanding he has “many functions that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API