Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Foster v. Swarts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1857PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from the Warren Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Foster and wife are the relators. They sued Daniel Swarts and his sureties, as the executor of John Swarts, deceased, on his bond. The breach alleged is the failure to pay a legacy of 50 dollars, which the testator by his will left to his daughter, Elizabeth Foster. It is further averred, that in settling with the Court, the executor retained this legacy in his hands; and that when afterwards demand was duly made, he refused to pay, &c.

Answer, that afterwards Foster and wife, by letter of attorney duly signed, &c., constituted and appointed one John Regle their attorney in fact, for them and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Horbach v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Johnson v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City of Atchison v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Dunn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Preston v. Sandford's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API