Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Hitchcock
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided April 2, 1942No. 370PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, District Judge.
This is an employees’ suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. on final hearing after the reception of oral and documentary evidence and after submission of the case on briefs by counsel for the respective parties.
Findings of Fact.
The defendant has a small sawmill and building supply business, which includes the making of window frames, door and window screens, and the like. All of the business of the defendant is conceded to be local, as distinguished from interstate, with the exception that the defendant manufactures small wooden strips,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jewel Tea Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Jax Beer Co. v. RedfernCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cochran v. Florida Nat. Bldg. Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1942
- McKeown v. Southern California Freight ForwardersDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
- Twyman v. FederationCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943
- Atlantic Co. v. BroughtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Atlantic Co. v. BroughtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.