Legal Opinion
Bank of California v. Shaber
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1880No. 7,060PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Application for a writ of mandamus to Win. It. Shaber, Treasurer, etc.
1Opinion of the Court
Myrick, J.:
This is an application for a mandamus, to compel the respondent, as Treasurer, to pay a certain claim out of moneys in the treasury.
It appears from the petition, that on the 13th day of July, 1878, one J. C. Smith commenced an action against the City and County of San Francisco, in the District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, in and for said city and county, to recover damages for injuries to property in said city and county, caused by mobs and riots, which action was defended by said city and county; that such proceedings were had therein that said Smith recovered a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Supervisors of Onondaga v. BriggsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Martin v. . Supervisors of Greene Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Board of Supervisors v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1871
- El Dorado County v. ElstnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- People ex rel. Central National Bank v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- Western Salt Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Stoddard v. BentonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Gregg v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- C. W. Mitchell's Administrator v. Board of CommissionersChampaign County Court of Common Pleas · 1898
- San Francisco Gas Light Co. v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.