Legal Opinion · Concurrence

San Francisco Gas Light Co. v. Dunn

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1882No. 7,473Published

Application for writ of mandamus.

1ConcurrenceSharpstein, J.

I concur in the judgment awarding the writ prayed. But the ground upon which I concur obviates the necessity of my expressing any opinion upon the' question so ably discussed by Mr. Justice McKinstry.

On the last hearing a point was brought prominently before the Court which, if presented at any former hearing, escaped my observation, and I infer that it also did that of the other members of the Court, as no allusion was made to it in any of the opinions heretofore filed.

The question to which I now refer is this: What are the functions of the Auditor in respect of a demand which has been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex relat. Bush & Higby v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Smyth v. TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850
  3. Bank of California v. ShaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API