Legal Opinion
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 4, 2015No. C.A No. 12-540-LPSPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge
Pending before the Court are the following motions:
1. Fairchild’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I.193); and
2. Power Integrations’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I.196).
Prior opinions addressed aspects of these motions. (See D.I. 295, 329) Here the Court resolves the remaining issues raised by both motions.1
*574I. BACKGROUND
On May 1, 2012, Plaintiffs Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collectively, “Fair-child” or “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against-Power Integrations, Inc. (“PI” or “Defendant”) alleging infringement…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.