Legal Opinion

Neal v. Black

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1896No. Appeal, No. 243PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 243, Oct. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1894, No. 179, on bill in equity. Bill in equity to enforce the revocation of a voluntary deed of trust.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 243, Oct. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1894, No. 179, on bill in equity. Bill in equity to enforce the revocation of a voluntary deed of trust. Before Slagle, J. The facts appear by the following opinion of the court below: The bill in this case was filed for the purpose of enforcing a revocation of a voluntary deed of trust made by plaintiff to William H. Black, who, under authority contained in the deed, subsequently appointed Thomas H. Lane as trustee in his stead, who is still acting as trustee. The bill sets forth that plaintiff…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

We find no error in this record that would justify either a reversal or modification of the decree. The learned judge’s *112findings of fact and conclusions of law are substantially correct, and fully warranted tbe decree dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs. There appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bowers' Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Moore v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  3. King v. York Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. May v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  5. Estate of ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API