Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1949No. 6 Div. 852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Review by certiorari of a judgment in a workman’s compensation suit wherein the court denied compensation to the plaintiff on the ground that he was not an employee of the defendant.

On the authority of such cases as Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. Martin, 233 Ala. 567, 172 So. 608; Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Crossley, 230 Ala. 403, 161 So. 536; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. George, 239 Ala. 80, 194 So. 183; De-Bardeleben Coal Corp. v. Richards et al., 251 Ala. 324, 37 So.2d 121, it is argued with some merit by able counsel for petitioner that the evidence was substantial to support…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Benoit Coal Mining Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Bell v. Tennessee Coal, Iron R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Warrior Stone & Contracting Co. v. De FoorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Tennis Courts, Inc. v. HintonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Weeks v. C.L. Dickert Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Calvert v. FunderburgSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. C. E. Adams & Co. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API