Legal Opinion

Mirnek v. West Penn Power Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 7PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff recovered a verdict in an action charging defendant with negligence, which resulted in the death of her husband; in due course the court below entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto, and this is the basis of plaintiff’s appeal. After all doubts are resolved in her favor, the essential facts are found to be as follows:

Decedent was an employee of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. At and near the place of the accident, defendant’s electric light poles, to which were attached wires carrying a dangerous current of electricity, were on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Emery v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Murdaugh v. Oxford BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Myers v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Alderwoods (Pennsylvania), Inc. v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Jowett v. Pennsylvania Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API