Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Quick

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 11, 2015No. 15-0347/MCPublished

1Concurrence

BAKER, Judge*

(concurring);

I concur with the majority opinion and its compelling analysis of stare decisis. I write separately to make three additional points.

First, while neither the Government nor Appellee have analyzed the historical underpinnings o'f Article 66(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866(d) (1996), the legislative history of the UCMJ and the predecessor Articles of War clearly indicates that Congress empowered the courts of criminal appeals — previously the boards of review — to order rehearings on sentence. The authority was first established in 1920, in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API