Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Albert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1978No. 59397, (Calendar No. 9)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Theodore G. Albert appeals an order of the State Bar Grievance Board denying his petition for reinstatement.

The Grievance Board found that Albert failed to establish that he met the requirements for reinstatement set forth in clauses (e), (g) and (h) of State Bar Rule 15, § 7.

That rule provides that when a license to prac*350tice law has been revoked or suspended for in excess of 120 days, a lawyer seeking reinstatement is required to establish by "clear and convincing evidence” that(e) His attitude towards his prior misconduct is one of genuine remorse;(g) He understands and will conduct himself…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. ButterfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Grievance Administrator v. AugustMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Grievance Administrator v. AugustMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In the Matter of AlbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In the Matter of FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API