Legal Opinion
Van Velzor v. City of Burleson
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 4, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-2508-GPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of the defendant, the City of Burleson, to dismiss the plaintiffs third amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (docket entry 41). For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
This case concerns alleged discriminatory practices of the City of Burleson, Texas against Joseph Van Velzor (“Van Velzor”) and similarly situated disabled individuals. Van Velzor is 60 years old and has a degenerative bone and joint disorder. See Third…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Poole v. Housing Authority for the Town of VintonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Rollins v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Tellis v. LeBlancDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022