Fraser v. Bowerman
New York Supreme Court
Action for the partition of real estate.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
By the 2d paragraph of the last will and testament of Sarah Fraser the entire use, rents, interest and income from her entire estate was given to her husband during his natural life, or so long as he should remain unmarried. By the codicil it was provided that the husband should have so much of the use, rents, interest and income as should be required for his personal support, etc., during the same period, instead of the entire use, etc. The codicil also declares the intention of the testatrix to be that from such use, income or rents his comfortable support and maintenance shall be paid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mott v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Scholle v. . ScholleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Trask v. . SturgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- McDonald v. . O'HaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Meakings v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re GargiuloNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- In re the Estate of TromblyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re the Estate of PavelkaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re FordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929