Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Pavelka

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 4, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Counsel for the widow confuses the two lines of cases respecting equitable conversion. The first comprises those in which there is an absolute, unequivocal, valid direction to sell. Under such circumstances an equitable conversion is invariably effected. (Matter of Taft, 144 Misc. 896, 899; Matter of Goldman, 142 id. 790, 792; Matter of Harris, 138 id. 287, 288; Matter of Gargiulo, Id. 90, 98.) The second class of cases includes those in which either no express power of sale is given or where such power is merely discretionary. Here equitable conversion will result only if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. In re the Estate of McKeoghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of TaftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. Fraser v. BowermanNew York Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CooleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of BommerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API