Legal Opinion

Baum v. Turner

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 9, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 75. — ACTION BY RAY BAUM, &c„ AGAINST .1. C. TURNER AND OTHERS FOR DAMAGES FOR SEIZING CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY UNDER AN ATTACHMEdNT— Appeal from Bell Circuit Court. Prom the judgment the plaintiff, Baum, appeals—

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge O’Rear.

Appellant filed this action against appellees to recover damages for the seizure of certain personal property under an attachment. The court sustained a general demurrer to her petition and she appeals. The sufficiency of the petition to state a cause of action is, therefore, the only question on the appeal.

It was alleged in the petition that the plaintiff on January 6, 1901, was married in Louisville, Kentucky, to Joe Baum; that shortly thereafter she and her husband removed to Middlesboro, Kentucky, and bought household goods, consisting of one bed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berry v. HanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  2. Steele v. LeonoriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Robb v. Maysville & Mt. Sterling Turnpike Road Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  4. Wilson's Assignee v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. In Re DenissonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. DeNisson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API