Buckley v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
In four of the seven actions for which plaintiffs seek to recover from the city of New York the value of the legal services rendered in behalf of Buckley, he was not a party; in the fifth action, though not a party to the suit originally brought, he was impleaded by the city, which filed a cross-claim against him for the purpose of holding him personally liable for alleged neglect. There can be no recovery against the city for the necessary costs of litigation in any of these cases. In the two remaining actions, where Buckley was made an original defendant, he was compelled to engage counsel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Kilroe v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Matter of Kilroe v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Pollock v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by11 opinions
- Corning v. Village of Laurel HollowNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Zimmer v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Leo v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Basmajian v. Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Blumberg v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.